top of page
Search

What if psychopaths arenโ€™t real?

I recently joined the NPR and PBS radio show/podcast, ๐™๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™  ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ ๐™†๐™ง๐™ž๐™จ ๐˜ฝ๐™ค๐™ฎ๐™™, to discuss why I believe psychopathy is not a scientifically meaningful construct/disorder and the wider implications for the legal system.


The conversation builds on arguments I have been developing over the past several years, and outlined in my book, ๐—ฃ๐˜€๐˜†๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐˜† ๐—จ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ. Namely, that many of the core claims surrounding psychopathy (e.g., deep-seated emotional deficits, clear neurobiological markers, strong correlation with violence) are far less empirically established than commonly assumed.


We also had a chance to discuss how the label persists (particularly in legal and forensic settings) despite these concerns. Once a concept becomes institutionally embedded, it can take on a life of its own, shaping decisions about risk, treatment, and liberty, far beyond what the underlying evidence can justify.


Enjoy!


ย 
ย 
ย 

Comments


© 2025 by Rasmus R. Larsen

bottom of page