What if psychopaths arenโt real?
- Rasmus Rosenberg Larsen
- Apr 15
- 1 min read
I recently joined the NPR and PBS radio show/podcast, ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐จ ๐ฝ๐ค๐ฎ๐, to discuss why I believe psychopathy is not a scientifically meaningful construct/disorder and the wider implications for the legal system.
The conversation builds on arguments I have been developing over the past several years, and outlined in my book, ๐ฃ๐๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ ๐จ๐ป๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฑ. Namely, that many of the core claims surrounding psychopathy (e.g., deep-seated emotional deficits, clear neurobiological markers, strong correlation with violence) are far less empirically established than commonly assumed.
We also had a chance to discuss how the label persists (particularly in legal and forensic settings) despite these concerns. Once a concept becomes institutionally embedded, it can take on a life of its own, shaping decisions about risk, treatment, and liberty, far beyond what the underlying evidence can justify.
Enjoy!



Comments